APPENDIX V

NOMINA UTIQUE REJICIENDA

D. PTERIDOPHYTA

The names printed in bold-face italics, and all combinations based on these names, are ruled as rejected under Art. 56, and none is to be used. The rejected names are arranged in alphabetical sequence, irrespective of rank, within each major group. Cross-references to the rejected basionyms are provided under some combinations based on them.

The rejected names are neither illegitimate nor invalid (Art. 6). Later homonyms of a rejected name (Art. 53), and names illegitimate because of inclusion of the type of a subsequently rejected name (Art. 52), are not to be used unless they are conserved.

Adiantum dissimile Schrad. in Gött. Gel. Anz. 87: 872. 29 Mai 1824
Holotypus: Brazil, “Bahia”, Prinz von Wied-Neuwied (BR)
Asplenium ramosum L., Sp. Pl.: 1082. 1 Mai 1753
Lectotypus (vide Jermy & Jarvis in Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 109: 321. 1992): Herb. Burser XX: 16 (UPS)
Cheilanthes dalhousiae Hook., Sp. Fil. 2: 80. 1852
Lectotypus (vide Fraser-Jenkins in Pakistan System. 5: 89. 1991): India: Simla, Lady Dalhousie, (K, neg. no. 7107, frond no. 4)
Nephrolepis auriculata (L.) Trimen, vide Polypodium auriculatum
Polypodium auriculatum L., Sp. Pl.: 1088. 1 Mai 1753
Lectotypus (vide Trimen in J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 24: 152. 1887): Ceylon, Herb. Hermann 1: 39, No. 383 (BM)